Where there is a right, there is a remedy.
This is a legal maxim, which means that where there is a right, there is a remedy. To get a legal remedy, a person should possess a legal right. Whenever the law gives a right to a person or prohibits an injury, then it also provides a remedy. So to sue in the court of law, one should establish his right and its violation.
B was a reputed officer in elections who wrongfully refused to take the vote of A. There was no loss suffered by A as the candidate whom he wanted to win won in spite of this. Since the right of A was violated, B was liable to pay damages.
“With an intention of making a will.”
This is an essential to make a valid will as for whatever will one seeks to enforce, if there exists no Animus Testandi, there can be no will.
A thing adjudged
The legal maxim is of latin origin meaning a matter or thing that has already been judicially decided on the basis of its merits and the same matter cannot be litigated between the two parties again. The maxim is of the belief that for one particular claim between litigants, one judicial contest is enough and reexamination of the same matter is not in the interest of the society. With the rapidly increasing pressure on the judiciary with rising judicial work, attending to a particular matter to one single contest is a reasonable restriction adopted.
The maxim denotes the meaning “proof overcomes presumption”.
The maxim denotes the meaning “proof overcomes presumption”. This maxim gives the effect of placing upon the opposing party the burden of establishing the nonexistence of the presumed fact, once the party invoking the presumption establishes the underlying facts giving rise to it.