“Abundant caution does no harm.”
This principle is generally applied for instruments in which superfluous words have been inserted to express the intention more clearly.
A was murdered and his post-mortem was done. After getting the reports, in order to protect the body, the principle of Abundans Cautela Non Nocet was applied.
1. Gokaraju RangarajuEtc v. State Of Andhra Pradesh (1981)
2. Thol. Thirumavalavan v. State of Tamil Nadu (2013)
administrative action of judicial review.
It is an administrative law, which technically means administrative action of judicial review. In a way, in which the court determines who may be an applicant for judicial review. the applicant has a sufficient interest in the matter to which the application relates.
Where there is a right, there is a remedy.
This is a legal maxim, which means that where there is a right, there is a remedy. To get a legal remedy, a person should possess a legal right. Whenever the law gives a right to a person or prohibits an injury, then it also provides a remedy. So to sue in the court of law, one should establish his right and its violation.
An incidental remark or opinion by a judge that is not binding.
The legal maxim is of latin origin meaning “said in passing” or an “incidental statement”. The maxim roughly translates to “by the way” and it refers to a statement a person said in passing. While talking in legal terms this maxim refers to a persuasive statement only and it is an unnecessary passage in a judicial opinion. Such statements are not supported by the force of precedent but may be significant to the case.